Bibliografia estesa sulla valutazione della Qualità dei Siti Web

  • Springer, M., Tyran, C., & Ross, S. (2013). Assessing the Quality of a Decision Support E-Service. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 9(2), 61-80.
  • Vuljak, I., & Mekovec, R. (2012). E-service Quality of Faculty Web Portals: Exploring the Students' Perspective. CECIIS 2012.
  • Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98-109.
  • Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. (2012). Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 450-463.
  • Yuan, L., Xi, C., & Xiaoyi, W. (2012). Evaluating the readiness of government portal websites in China to adopt contemporary public administration principles. Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 403-412.
  • Ho, L. A., Kuo, T. H., & Lin, B. (2012). The mediating effect of website quality on Internet searching behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 840-848.
  • Alshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. (2012). The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: AnEmpirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.2410.
  • Saha, P., Nath, A. K., & Salehi-Sangari, E. (2012). Evaluation of government e-tax websites: an information quality and system quality approach. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(3), 300-321.
  • Alghamdi, R., Alhussain, T., Drew, S., & Alshehri, M. A. (2012). The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: An Empirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. In ACIS 2012. http://hdl. handle. net/10536/DRO/DU: 30049078.
  • Kincl, T., & Štrach, P. (2012). Measuring website quality: asymmetric effect of user satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(7), 647-657.
  • Mittal, H., Sharma, M., & Mittal, J. P. (2012, January). Analysis and Modelling of Websites Quality Using Fuzzy Technique. In Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (ACCT), 2012 Second International Conference on (pp. 10-15). IEEE.
  • Cebi, S. (2012). A quality evaluation model for the design quality of online shopping websites. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.
  • Orehovački, T., Granić, A., & Kermek, D. (2012). Exploring the quality in use of web 2.0 applications: the case of mind mapping services. In Current Trends in Web Engineering (pp. 266-277). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  • Rafe, V., & Monfaredzadeh, M. (2012). A qualitative framework to assess hospital/medical websites. Journal of medical systems, 36(5), 2927-2939.
  • Cebi, S. (2012). Determining importance degrees of website design parameters based on interactions and types of websites. Decision Support Systems.
  • Kanellopoulos, D., & Kotsiantis, S. (2012). Evaluating and recommending Greek newspapers' websites using clustering. Program: electronic library and information systems, 46(1), 71-91.
  • Yee, A. P. S., Gan, G. G. G., & Ling, L. S. (2012). Best Practises of'Green'Websites: A Content Analysis of European and Asian Non-Governmental Organisations. In Proceedings of USM-AUT International Conference 2012 Sustainable Economic Development: Polici
  • Natarajan, V. S., Parayitam, S., & Sharma, T. (2012). The relationship between web quality and user satisfaction: the moderating effects of security and content. International Journal of Business Excellence, 5(1), 52-76.
  • Carlos, V. S., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2012). Web site quality evaluation in Higher Education Institutions. Procedia Technology, 5, 273-282.
  • Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2012). Role of web site design quality in satisfaction and word of mouth generation. Journal of Service Management, 23(1), 79-96.